WOLEDZI v. AKUFO-ADDO and Another HIGH COURT, ACCRA 20 March 1980
CECILIA KORANTENG-ADDOW J.
This is Part 3 of Akufo-Addo’s inhumanity to man.
Nana Akufo-Addo was defended in this action by James Amoako-Glover, a lawyer in Nana Akufo-Addo’s Law Chambers at the time and a one-time SRC President of the University of Ghana, Legon, who was always associated with drugs and who has since become a mental case. He still walks the streets of Accra.
Now read on——-
Mr. Atadika, counsel for the plaintiff, has urged the court to accept the spot stained with a pool of blood as the place where contact of the two cars occurred and to accept that the blood was the plaintiff’s. Where there is an accident, resulting in casualty of the passengers or driver, and blood is found at the scene, I think there is sufficient basis to make the inference that the blood spilt on the road or scene of accident must have been spilt by the person who was injured in the accident. There were only the two drivers in the two cars. The first defendant had no external injury or any injury at all. But there is evidence that the plaintiff had very serious head injuries and fracture of the left arm. Therefore blood on the ground at the scene may reasonably be said to be that of the plaintiff.
Source: GhanaWeb
